Insights^

Find our analysis on legislation, regulations, MedPAC meetings, and more. 

Uncertainty over Medicaid Coverage Looms for Millions

An abrupt end to the public health emergency (PHE) on April 16 could shock the health care system – absent any new laws or regulations to extend the PHE’s popular emergency provisions.  Last week’s blog post discussed some of the important Medicare telehealth waivers currently in place due to  the PHE, and how ending the PHE would affect access to these health care services.  This week’s blog post focuses on what ending the PHE would mean for Medicaid and the millions of people who’ve gained coverage since the pandemic started.

Background: Medicaid is a federal and state health insurance program that provides health coverage for eligible low-income adults, children, pregnant women, elderly adults, and people with disabilities. Currently, 76 million Americans – nearly a quarter of the US population – is covered by Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), a program that focuses on children.

Then came the pandemic.  To ensure continuous health care coverage, Congress enacted the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in March 2020, which gave states a 6.2% Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) increase if they agreed to maintain eligibility levels in place at the time.

Before the PHE went into effect, states regularly reviewed whether people still qualified for coverage based on income, age, disability status, and other factors.  Since the PHE began, however, state Medicaid agencies have been prohibited from disenrolling anyone during the pandemic.

The end of the PHE could eventually trigger a tsunami of coverage losses, which experts project would affect 15 million Americans – including 6.7 million children Once the PHE ends, state Medicaid officials will be tasked with evaluating the eligibility requirements of all their enrollees, which they did not need to do over the past year and half. Beneficiaries who earn too much money or failed to provide necessary information about income or residency could be dropped from their coverage, leaving them uninsured for a period of time with Medicaid programs facing the resurface of the “churn.”

However, the PHE’s end wouldn’t immediately cause millions to lose coverage.  The administration has said that the additional Medicaid funds provided through the FMAP increase would last until the end of the quarter when the PHE expires, meaning that if the PHE truly ends on April 16, the additional Medicaid funds would last until June 30 – giving state Medicaid officials some breathing room.

The administration has also said it would give state Medicaid agencies a year to redetermine eligibility for current enrollees, but many states could be pressed to reevaluate immediately and ultimately drop coverage for some beneficiaries due to financial pressures.

What happens next?  The Biden administration has not specifically said whether it will extend the PHE or let it expire on April 16 .  However, as an indication of what the administration may do, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) put out a request for information (RFI) on February 17 seeking feedback to develop a more comprehensive strategy on Medicaid and CHIP.  According to the RFI, CMS is looking for specific feedback on access to health care, including maintaining coverage and looking to improve provider participation by ensuring adequate provider payment rates to encourage provider availability and quality.

Absent specific actions from the federal government, states should consider these steps to blunt the impact of coverage losses:

  • Use available funding sources like COVID-19 relief funds to invest in community-based navigators to educate beneficiaries about their coverage options, like ACA marketplace coverage.
  • Improve the redetermination process by establishing an automated review process that uses different data sources to verify eligibility.
  • Use multiple outreach strategies like telephone, email, and text to contact beneficiaries who are harder to reach and for whom state Medicaid offices has received returned mail.
national-cancer-institute-NFvdKIhxYlU-unsplash-1920x1280

What Texas Could Tell Us About the 2022 Midterm Primaries

Welcome to primary season.  The 2022 midterm primaries officially kicks off today in Texas, where polls are open until 10pm local time this evening.  For those curious about how the primary season will unfold, Texas is the state to watch.  That’s because the results of these races could provide some clues on how some major trends could play out in the upcoming midterms and provide insight on how voters view the political parties.

How Much Influence Does Trump Have Over the GOP?

Ever since Donald Trump’s defeat in the 2020 presidential election, pundits have wondered how much loyalty to Donald Trump will matter to Republican candidates and voters going forward.  Polls have indicated that the former president’s hold on GOP voters is waning – a January 2021 poll found Republican voters were evenly split on whether they considered themselves supporters of Trump or the Republican Party, while a January 2022 found a majority of Republicans said they support the party and not Trump.

In Republican primary races across the nation, pro-Trump candidates are facing off against candidates who signal a stronger loyalty to the GOP, and one Texas race could preview which camp might fare better in the 2022 Republican primaries.

Back in 2020, Rep. Van Taylor (R-TX) won his district comprising the norther suburbs of Dallas by a comfortable margin.  At the same time, Trump only narrowly won against Biden in what is officially the 3rd Congressional District of Texas.  But a lot has changed since November 2020.  A few months later, Taylor became one of 35 House Republicans to vote for an independent commission to investigate the January 6th riot at the US Capitol.  Since then, supporters of the former president have criticized this group of Republicans for their lack of loyalty to Trump.  

While Taylor did not go as far as to vote to impeach the former president last year, his vote in support of the January 6th commission still leaves him vulnerable to GOP challengers in the March 1 primary.  While Trump has not endorsed any of Taylor’s challengers, the Texas congressman still faces a few tough opponents, including former Collin County Judge Keith Self and Suzanne Harp, the mother of Rep. Madison Cawthorn’s (R-NC) chief of staff.  How Taylor fares in the March 1 primary could portent the fate of other Republican incumbents who’ve drawn the ire of the party’s pro-Trump faction.

How Will Progressives Fare against Centrists in the Democratic Primaries?

In Democratic primaries across the country, voters are deciding over with whether to support centrist incumbents   or support progressives who are more aligned with the party’s liberal policies.    This battle will be played out on March 1 in the Democratic primary for the 28th Congressional District, which runs from San Antonio to the Rio Grande River.  In 2020, incumbent Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) defeated progressive primary challenger Jessica Cisneros by just four points.

Since the last election, congressional districts in Texas have been redrawn, and the 28th District is now more left leaning than in the previous decade.  In 2022, Cisneros is once again challenging Cuellar for his seat, and this time, she’s secured endorsements from fellow progressives Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT).  Adding interest to the race is the fact that Cuellar’s residence and campaign office were raided by the FBI a few weeks ago.

Since the redrawn 28th District is more favorable to Democrats this time around, Cisneros could, in theory, have an advantage on ideological grounds.  However, Mexican-American voters who dominate the Democratic electorate there aren’t particularly warm to progressive ideasthe 2022 Democratic primary for the 28th District is looking just as competitive as it was in 2020.

How Will New Voting Laws Affect Turnout?

Since the 2020 election, 19 mostly GOP-controlled states like Georgia and Kansas enacted new laws to restrict voting.  States were able to do this thanks to the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down an important provision of the Voting Rights Act.  In Texas, new voting laws include ID requirements and limit voting hours from 6am to 10pm local time.

These new laws might suppress turnout, but the impact is likely to be minimal.  That’s because historically, voter turnout in Texas primary elections is low, as less than 20% of registered voters participate in midterm primaries most years.  Early voting for 2022 in Texas started already on February 14, and results show lower than average turnout so far, although early voting numbers the counties report to the state do not include mail-in ballots.   And traditionallyearly voting has not been a good indicator of overall turnout in Texas.   This means we may not know the full impact of new voting laws in Texas until this November’s midterm election.

pete-alexopoulos-JFfDRKlI3hY-unsplash-1920x1081

What Happened, What You Missed: February 21-25

Future of ARPA-H In Doubt

The Biden administration’s plans to set up a new biomedical research agency called the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) have become more uncertain since Eric Lander, the president’s chief science advisor, stepped down two weeks ago.  Former National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins has temporarily stepped in to serve as science advisor, and he favors keeping the new agency within NIH – a departure from many Democratic lawmakers who prefer that ARPA-H remain a separate agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  Republicans in Congress who are critical of the NIH’s handling of the pandemic might be reluctant to provide funding for a new organization within NIH, even if it’s to support new research.  More so, the two top Republican Senators who support biomedical research, Sens. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Roy Blunt (R-MO), are retiring soon, which could further delay creating ARPA-H as the administration may run into trouble finding supporters in a possible GOP-controlled Senate next year.

CDC Endorses 8-Week Vaccine Interval

On Tuesday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its COVID-19 mRNA vaccine guidance to expand the recommended time between the two initial vaccine doses from 3-4 weeks to eight weeks.  The new timeline apples to people over the age of 12, although the CDC still recommends that people who are immunocompromised or over the age of 65 adhere to the usual 3–4-week dosing intervals.  According to the CDC, increasing the interval between the first two vaccine doses may reduce the risk of severe side effects like inflammation of the heart wall.  The CDC’s recommendation of waiting at least five months to receive a third “booster” dose remains unchanged.

HHS Distributes $560M from Provider Relief Fund

HHS announced on Thursday that it will distribute $560 million from the Provider Relief Fund to over 4,100 providers, leaving $5.5 billion remaining in the fund.  According to HHS, the current phase of distribution has focused on equity, including higher reimbursements for smaller providers and bonus payments for providers who serve Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.  HHS additionally commented that providers can use the funds to address workforce shortages and staff burnouts.  The latest release of funding comes as health care providers call on Congress to replenish the fund with at least $20 billion.

CMS Pulls the Plug on ACO Option for Rural Providers in CHART Model

On Tuesday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that it has removed the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Transformation Track from the Community Health and Rural Transformation (CHART) Model, which provided an alternative payment model for rural providers to participate in.  According to the webpage for the CHART Model, CMS decided to remove the ACO track as part of a “broader effort” to develop a strategy to increase ACO adoption in rural areas. While CMS did not offer additional details on its decision to eliminate the track, the agency is currently looking to remove any duplicative payment models to ease the burden on providers.  The CHART model was created in 2020 to help Medicare beneficiaries living in rural communities get access to health care services.

ICYMI: There’s Now an App for Networking on the Hill

Congressional staffers haven’t had a lot of opportunities to network in person over the last two years.  Therefore, to create more opportunities for staffers to connect in-person, a digital director for a Republican congressman recently launched CNCT, a social and professional networking app.  Limited to individuals with a senate.gov or house.gov email address, CNCT will connect staffers through coffee meetup and events and allow for groups to message one another.   The app is scheduled to launch on March 18.

hans-reniers-lQGJCMY5qcM-unsplash-1920x1280

Everything You Need to Know About the 2022 Primary Elections

The 2022 primary season kicks off in Texas on March 1, and with the start of primary season comes some big questions about which direction either party will go.  Democrats will be duking out over what direction the party will take after its agenda has largely stalled in Congress, while Republican candidates face tough questions about former President Donald Trump’s role in the party and whether they acknowledge the results of the 2020 presidential election.

On top of this, the 2022 primary season includes numerous races for offices like governor and attorney general, who will play an important role in certifying election results for 2024 and beyond, adding extra weight to the questions some candidates will face over democracy and the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

Wait, what is a primary?  Political parties hold primary elections to select their nominees for candidates who will run on behalf of the party in the general election.  In a primary, Republicans run against Republicans, while Democrats run against other Democrats.  In contrast, the general election determines which candidates will occupy offices that are up for election.

Additionally, different states have different rules on how they conduct their primaries.  These are the four types of basic primary elections:

  • Open primaries, where anyone of any political party affiliation may vote.
  • Closed primaries, where only those voters who registered with that particular political party may vote.
  • Hybrid primaries, also called semi-open and semi-closed primaries, where anyone of any political party affiliation can vote, but can only vote in one primary.
  • Runoff primaries, where a few states hold a second primary between two candidates with the most votes.  Of note, both Louisiana and Georgia will have runoff races for their general elections scheduled after Election Day on November 8 for the top-two candidates if one candidate fails to win at least 50% of the vote in their most recent primary.

Below is a list of all key primary dates for congressional races with their respective state and runoff status.

Date State Type
March 1 Texas Runoff
May 3 Indiana Open
May 3 Ohio Open
May 10 Nebraska Hybrid
May 10 West Virginia Hybrid
May 17 Idaho Hybrid
May 17 Kentucky Closed
May 17 Oregon Closed
May 17 Pennsylvania Closed
May 17 North Carolina Runoff
May 24 Alabama Runoff
May 24 Arkansas Runoff
May 24 Georgia Runoff
May 24* Texas* Runoff
June 7 California Open
June 7 Iowa Open
June 7 Mississippi Runoff
June 7 Montana Open
June 7 New Jersey Hybrid
June 7 New Mexico Closed
June 7 South Dakota Hybrid
June 14 Maine Closed
June 14 Nevada Closed
June 14 North Dakota Open
June 14 South Carolina Runoff
June 21 Virginia Open
June 21 Alabama* Runoff
June 21 Arkansas* Runoff
June 21* Georgia* Runoff
June 28 Colorado Hybrid
June 28 Illinois Open
June 28 Maryland Closed
June 28 New York Closed
June 28 Oklahoma Runoff
June 28 Utah Hybrid
June 28* Mississippi* Runoff
June 28* South Carolina* Runoff
July 26* North Carolina* Runoff
August 2 Arizona Hybrid
August 2 Kansas Hybrid
August 2 Michigan Open
August 2 Missouri Open
August 2 Washington Open
August 4 Tennessee Open
August 9 Connecticut Closed
August 9 Minnesota Open
August 9 Vermont Open
August 9 Wisconsin Open
August 13 Hawaii Open
August 16 Alaska Open
August 16 Wyoming Open
August 16 South Dakota Hybrid
August 23 Florida Closed
August 23* Oklahoma* Runoff
September 6 Massachusetts Hybrid
September 13 Delaware Closed
September 13 New Hampshire Hybrid
September 13 Rhode Island Hybrid
November 8 Louisiana Runoff
December 6* Georgia* Runoff
December 10* Louisiana* Runoff

*Indicates runoff election date.

tiffany-tertipes-9A5uvtrO1Vw-unsplash-scaled

The Uncertain Future for Telehealth

April 16, 2022.  That’s the date the current public health emergency (PHE) is set to expire.  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) initially promised to provide 60 days’ notice to states and health care organizations before ending the PHE.  However, the Biden administration has been mum on its plans regarding the PHE and has given no indication on whether they will extend the PHE again, leaving stakeholders in doubt as to what will happen to the many temporary health policies that are tied to the PHE.

Background: HHS declared a PHE for the COVID-19 pandemic on January 31, 2020.  Since then, the PHE has been renewed by HHS eight times in 90-day increments with the most recent renewal being on January 14, 2022.my

The conversation over whether to renew the PHE couldn’t be timelier, as a growing number of federal and state officials have been discussing plans to loosen COVID-19 restrictions as the US shifts to treating COVID-19 as an endemic than a pandemic.  For example, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to the President, recently commented that the US is exiting the “full-blow” pandemic phase of the COVID-19 crisis, and a number of blue states and cities have begun to announce plans to roll-back certain pandemic requirements like indoor masking.  Additionally, over 70 Republican members of Congressman sent a letter to HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra last week requesting for a concrete timeline on when the PHE will come to an end.

However, ending the PHE is no simple matter.  That’s because numerous temporary policies related to telehealth, COVID-19 treatments and vaccines, and Medicaid are specifically tied to the PHE.  In this blog post, we’ll focus on telehealth, while COVID-19 treatments and Medicaid will be covered in future installments.

The CARES Act notably expanded Medicare coverage of telehealth services to make it easier for beneficiaries to access health care services while minimizing the exposure to COVID-19.  These temporary changes include:

  • Waiving Medicare’s geographic site originating requirement to allow beneficiaries to access telehealth in all settings.
  • Allowing audiologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, and other providers to provide telehealth services under Medicare.
  • Coverage of telehealth services conducted through audio-only technology like telephones and audio-visual technology like smartphone in more instances.
  • Reimbursement of 238 telehealth services, compared to 202 prior to the PHE.
  • Coverage of telehealth services without a pre-existing doctor-patient relationship.

However, all these temporary changes and waivers will expire once the PHE ends.  While members of Congress have put forth multiple legislative proposals to extend Medicare’s temporary telehealth provisions beyond the PHE, few have gained traction.  Adding to the uncertainty is the administration’s lack of communication on whether to renew the PHE another 90 days leaving both providers and beneficiaries in limbo over the status of temporary telehealth flexibilities.   

That’s why stakeholders are pushing for the PHE to stick around after April.  On February 10, the Federal of American Hospitals sent a letter to HHS requesting that the PHE be extended “well beyond” its current expiration date in two months’ time.  FAH argued that an abrupt end to PHE-authorized operations like telehealth run the risk of “destabilizing fragile health care networks” as these temporary measures have been in place for about two years allowing for patients to rely on their care.

And over the course of the past two years, telehealth usage has surged to the point that it now plays a vital role in the way people access health care.  According to HHS, telehealth utilization saw a 63-fold increase in 2020.  The adoption of telehealth in behavioral health was particularly noticeable, which saw about a third of its visits done remotely in 2020.  While telehealth usage has declined somewhat since 2020 and outpatient visits have returned to pre-pandemic levels, overall telehealth utilization remains elevated compared to 2019 levels, and patients and providers don’t  want to give up this health care tool that benefited so many patients.

national-cancer-institute-L8tWZT4CcVQ-unsplash-1920x1280

Subscribe to Us Now!

Be a DC insider by getting our updates straight to your inbox