The Week Ahead

Stay informed with our weekly buzz about what’s going on in Washington, DC.

Week Ahead: Key Decisions on Budget/Reconciliation

We’re in a three-week push to see where Republicans land on uniting behind an ambitious budget and setting up reconciliation.  Yes, the Senate is working on getting the nominees for FDA, NIH, and CMS through the confirmation process, but the real focus of health care policy right now is behind the scenes on reconciliation.  What key decisions do Republicans need to make?  Let’s get into it – welcome to the Week Ahead! 

One Bill or Two 

Didn’t they already decide it’s going to be one bill?  Well, not exactly.  The Senate budget sets up 2 reconciliation bills and the House sets up 1 bill.  For now, Republicans are strategizing around creating one massive reconciliation bill given President Trump’s endorsement of “one big beautiful bill,” and Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-LA) impressive vote maneuvering in February.  It’s nearly April and Republicans want a win.  If things start to fall apart, a two-bill strategy might come back into play. 

How to Treat the Tax Cuts 

One issue Republicans are united on is extending (for as long as they can) the 2017 tax cuts passed under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).  The question is what cost scoring method to use.  If Republicans choose a current LAW baseline, they have to pay for the tax cuts to the tune of some $4 trillion.  If Republicans choose a current POLICY baseline, they don’t.  Current law means the tax cuts expire at the end of 2025 and any tax cuts after that are “new” and must be paid for.  Current policy means the tax cuts that expire in 2025 are assumed to continue past December 31.  Sound fishy?  Surprisingly, it’s not.  Both parties have used both types of baselines at different times depending on the goals they wanted to achieve at the time. 

How to Treat Spending
The debate over using current law or current policy baselines also affects how the bill could consider increasing in spending.  While not super important to get into right now, Republicans could set up a budget that treats spending differently than what is assumed, making it less expensive on paper to spend money on programs they want to boost. 

What About Medicaid? 

Is the $880 billion over 10 years in the House bill a ceiling and $1 billion in the Senate bill a floor?  Not really.  First, the Senate didn’t touch the tax cuts in their bill, so the Senate position on a dollar amount to cut Medicaid is unknown.   The last major Republican attempt to reduce Medicaid spending in 2005 started as an ambitious $60 or so billion bill and got whittled down to a $10 billion cut.   

Also, on Medicaid, for Republicans, it’s not solely about offsetting other spending or the tax cuts.  While the tax cuts may not have to be paid for because of the budget baseline they choose, Republicans see their majority as an opportunity to address certain issues in Medicaid.  First off is the Biden minimum nurse staffing rule – that one is certainly wiped out in a reconciliation bill.  But that is not the only target – think about programs that states use to increase federal money coming into their coffers like state directed payments, provider taxes, and intergovernmental transfers.    

What About Medicare? 

Isn’t reconciliation just about Medicaid?  Nope, as soon as you bring in the Senate Finance Committee’s jurisdiction into reconciliation, you have Medicare AND Medicaid on the table.  While a lot of attention is being paid to Medicaid changes, expect Medicare changes.  What might they be looking at?  Think the greatest hits of recent Congresses – PBM reform, site-neutrality, Medicare Advantage coding changes, and more.   

Could There Be Health Care Spending? 

Yes, think physician payment reform and the potential of permanent extensions on telehealth.  Don’t forget the advanced premium tax credits that expire at the end of 2025.   If there is one bill, it will definitely be “big.”  Big doesn’t mean a lot of spending – Republicans will want to offset spending in Medicare by reductions in Medicare (or potentially Medicaid, though that’s not been their approach for the last 25 years). 

BUT WAIT… 

Before we get too far ahead of ourselves, remember the Senate and House have to agree on an overall approach to the BUDGET.  The budget is really a set of directions to the committees of jurisdictions to make policy based on a dollar target; the budget is NOT reconciliation.  The Senate and House have to agree to the same budget and then pass it in both chambers before the (health care) committees can put together legislation.  Then, those committees have to pass their reconciliation bills, the Budget committees have to package them up into one reconciliation bill, and then that reconciliation bill has to pass both the Senate and House.   

It’s a gauntlet, ladies and gentlemen. 

What’s the Timeline? 

These three weeks are critical for Republicans to try to coalesce around a BUDGET before they leave for April break.   Can they do it?   It seems ambitious when you can’t lose more than 2 votes in the Senate and only a handful in the House.   Florida’s special elections on April 1 to replace two vacant House seats are likely to grow the House Republican majority.  But it’s one step forward and two steps back for Speaker Johnson, as Rep. Elise Stefanik’s confirmation to be the UN Ambassador will mean a likely Democratic pick-up through a governor appointment.  

There You Have It 

Are you exhausted yet?  You can’t be!  This is the biggest year for health care policy since the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  Where were you during the ACA debate?   Let us know!  

Week Ahead: C.R. on Deck

We’ve reached the week of the March 14 deadline for when the current continuing resolution to keep the government open expires. Meanwhile, the House and Senate remain far apart on budget reconciliation, the Senate continues churning President Trump’s nominees, and the White House seeks to clarify Elon Musk’s role in the administration. So, with that, let’s get into it. Welcome to the Week Ahead!

The Administration 

To say Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has disrupted Washington is about as much of an understatement as saying Elon Musk is a car salesman. From prompting mass protests to filling up the chairs in town hall meetings across the country, DOGE is making itself known. But there are still a lot of questions about what DOGE’s role is. President Trump sought to clarify that role with a Truth Social post in which he praised DOGE but also said he was instructing DOGE to work with cabinet secretaries to be “very precise” about future staffing decisions, stating a preference for the “scalpel” rather than the “hatchet.”

We don’t know how things will play out if Musk and cabinet secretaries disagree about distinguishing the scalpel from the hatchet. We do know that DOGE continues to disrupt things in Washington, and we don’t expect that to change. Case in point, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent most of its employees a $25,000 buyout offer. Responses are due March 14.

In non-DOGE news, we are watching the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which as of March 7, has received 7 rules including hospital inpatient, inpatient psych, inpatient rehab, skilled nursing, hospice, Medicare Advantage, and the Affordable Care Act Health Insurance Exchange Marketplace. That last one could set off a firestorm if it makes major changes to the Marketplace that are seen as weakening protections put in place by the Biden administration to help people sign up, or stay on, ACA plans.

The Senate 

All eyes are on Dr. Mehmet Oz’s nomination hearing on March 14 for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator. Expect questions about DOGE and access to agency data to be a top question from Democrats. Additionally, Medicare Advantage should come up, given his past support of the program as a Senate candidate.
The Senate HELP Committee is cranking through its noms. The Committee will vote on Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya for National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Martin Makary for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 13, giving them a shot at being confirmed by the Senate before their recess week of March 17. Additionally, the Committee will consider the nomination of Dr. David Weldon to be Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on March 13. Watch for vaccine policy to dominate this hearing, including a review of Dr. Weldon’s past statements about the possible connections between certain vaccines and autism.

Another hearing to watch this week is the Senate Special Committee on Aging March 12 hearing on “breaking the cycle of senior loneliness.”  Pay attention to any comments related to the administration’s recent Medicaid bulletin pulling back on health-related social needs.

The House 

House Republicans unveiled bill text for a continuing resolution (C.R.) to keep the government funded through the rest of the fiscal year (September 30). The bill also extends certain health care policies, including telehealth flexibilities, through September 30. Notably, the bill does not include anything to address physicians’ concerns about Medicare reimbursement cuts. The House Rules Committee is scheduled to meet to consider the bill on March 10, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is planning to have the House vote on the bill on March 11. The Speaker can only lose one Republican if Democrats unite against the bill. Two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Tony Gonzalez (R-TX), have expressed opposition to the C.R., but the bill does have the support of House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-MD). House Democratic leadership has expressed opposition to the bill, but individual Democrats could decide to vote for the bill if the alternative is shutting down the government.

A bill also must pass in the Senate with 60 votes before it makes it to the President’s desk. A big question that remains unanswered is if passage of a “full-year C.R.” triggers mandatory spending cuts under the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) of 2023 (1% below FY 2023 appropriations). It will be up to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Office of Management and the Budget (OMB) to report on any breaches of the FRA’s enforcement caps.

We are also tracking some House health care hearings scheduled for March 11. The House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee is holding a hearing on access to post-acute care and the House Veterans’ Affairs Health Subcommittee is a holding a legislative hearing on 15 bills.

There You Have It 

NCAA basketball’s Selection Sunday is coming up on March 16. Who are you rooting for? Will you be filling out a bracket? Let us know. Make it a great week!

Week Ahead: A Tale of Two Cities

Yep, we are using the title of the great Charles Dickens’ novel to describe the Senate and House this week.  Their visions for a budget are vastly different and they need to come together to make “one big, beautiful bill.”  Will they choose “the age of wisdom” or “the age of foolishness?” It’s all in the eyes of the beholder, isn’t it?  With that, let’s get into it.  Welcome to the Week Ahead!  

The Administration 

SOTU? Nope…it’s actually called a joint address to Congress.  President Trump will address a joint session of Congress on March 4, marking his first major speech since beginning his second term. (While often referred to as a State of the Union (SOTU), a president never delivers an official SOTU address in the first year of a new term.)  President Trump is expected to outline his administration’s policy priorities, including recent plans to impose new tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada, as well as his approach to foreign relations, particularly concerning Ukraine. 

We are wondering about what scooby-snacks the President will hand out this year.  Recall previous made-for-television addresses where he would announce special awards to gallery attendees…. 

Democrat response… who’s the party’s next rising star?  Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, who previously served in the House and flipped a red district in 2018 before narrowly winning her Senate seat in a state that Trump also carried, will deliver the party’s response.  She will highlight alternative policy perspectives with a focus on kitchen-table issues and protecting Medicaid and Medicare.  The speech is often a launching pad for a rising star to spotlight party priorities and establish a national presence. 

Overturning 50 years of precedent, HHS posted a policy that exempts from public comment matters related to “agency management or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts,” calling the process inefficient to the operation of the Department.  Notice and public comment will continue for all matters required by statute. 

Connect the dots with a DOGE executive order for a 30-day sprint to review and reduce Federal contracts, grants, and loans related to immigration, law enforcement, the military, public safety, and the intelligence community.  

DOGE is coming for you, HHS.  Think CMMI contracts, HRSA grants and loans, NIH. 

The Senate  

Order up, it’s health care nominations in the Senate.  We will hear from Jayanta Bhattacharya, nominee to head the National Institutes of Health on March 5, and Dr. Marty Makary to lead the Food and Drug Administration on March 6.  

What should we expect?  For NIH, hot topics will include the slashing of indirect costs for researchers, job eliminations in the federal government, and what the research agenda will be for the administration.  For FDA, well yes, vaccine safety and efficacy, but don’t forget about the drug and device approval process, supply chain and US manufacturing of drugs, and the controversial lab-developed test rule. 

And don’t forget (how could we) that the government funding runs out March 14, and the health care extenders at the end of March.  While Republicans and Democrats were working to complete their FY 2025 bills, it’s looking increasingly likely another continuing resolution is in the offing.  This time, the extension would run through September 30 with another extension.  Riding along would be the health care extenders through September 30 and December 31. 

Senate hearings this week 

The House 

The hard work of hammering out a budget bill begins. While the Speaker delivered “one big, beautiful bill,” he signaled his support for the Senate Republican leadership’s approach to taxes.  Can Speaker Johnson get his fiscal hardliners on board?  Senate and House Republican leaders will be meeting this week (and beyond) to determine how best to craft a budget resolution that achieves the President’s domestic agenda AND pass both chambers.   

Don’t forget, they must pass the same budget, then the committees have to figure out which policies to fit the budget, then both chambers have to pass that whole budget reconciliation package.  The Speaker has stated his goal of delivering a final reconciliation package to the President in May.   

One person to keep an eye on is Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) as Senate Republicans have yet to confirm her for the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Her vote has been an important one for Speaker Johnson as Republicans have 2 vacancies in Florida that will not be filled until early April. But with the world scene heating up, how much longer the White House is willing to wait for her nomination is unclear.  

In an effort of bipartisanship, the House will take up the Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act . Sponsored by Reps. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), the bill would codify an IRS policy stating that employers who offer high-deductible health plan coverage for their employees the option of including pre-deductible coverage for chronic illnesses.  

There You Have It 

Did you know that A Tale of Two Cities is considered historical fiction?  We in DC feel sometimes we are both working on history and fiction at the same time!  What’s your favorite genre?  Let us know! Make it a great week!  

Week Ahead: Love Is in the Air?

Valentine’s Day may be past, but congrats to our very own Zach Schulz who got married over the weekend With tensions high on Capitol Hill, we could use some newlywed love around hereLet’s get into it, welcome to the Week Ahead!  

The Administration 

We have two questions for President Trump on the budget reconciliation debate.  (Well, we have a lot more than 2 questions, and want to know way more than just what he thinks about the budget, but let’s stay focused, people.)  

First, about that “one big, beautiful bill.”    The President surprised a lot of folks – including Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Budget Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) – when he publicly endorsed the House bill over the Senate bill.  At this point, he has expressed openness to multiple different budget bills to finance $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and achieve his domestic agenda.   

The Senate approach takes 2 bites at the apple and is ostensibly an easier path.  The Senate bill that passed February 20 is much cheaper ($340 billion), requiring less government spending offsets.  The House takes 1 bite and loads up on Medicaid cuts to offset the costs of making the 2017 tax cuts permanent. 

Second, where is he on Medicare and Medicaid?  In a statement to Politico on February 19, the White House said they were “committed to protecting Medicare and Medicaid while slashing the waste, fraud, and abuse within those programs.”  Later that day, an updated statement was released leaving out the word Medicare.  Then the endorsement of the House bill which contemplates an eye-popping $880B of changes to Medicaid.   

Feeling some whiplash?So are we.  

So where is his head?  The President wants what he wants right away.  While complicating the legislative process, he’s been completely consistent about driving the conversation and letting the Republican Congress deal with the mess.  Expect more unexpected. 

The Senate  

The Senate budget has no explicit reforms to Medicaid and Medicare but does include direction to the Senate Finance Committee to identify at least $1billion in savings.  While Senate Republicans point to their fervent interest in repealing the minimum staffing rule for nursing homes to achieve their budget target, Senate Democrats and advocates warn the Senate approach may lead to cuts in Medicaid and Medicare. 

Now what?  The Senate moves on this week to nominations – noms, noms, and more noms – as they eagerly watch the drama over in the House.  In case you missed, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the strategist behind Senate judicial nominations – announced he won’t seek re-election in 2026. 

What about the March 14 government funding deadline?  With rumors that the Senate and House Appropriations leads have reached a deal on the overall dollar figure, Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA) warned against a long-term continued funding resolution where Congress would relinquish the power of the purse to President Trump and Elon Musk. 

Senate hearings this week 

  • 2/26:  Senate Aging Committee hearing on Combating the Opioid Epidemic 

The House 

The House is coming back to DC from time in their districts hearing from constituents about President Trump’s recent actions and the House budget.  They are getting an earful about the impact that potential cuts could have on access to health care for the millions who rely on the Medicaid safety net. 

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and House Republican leadership don’t seem deterred and are set to vote on the budget February 25.  

Will it pass?  Well, that President Trump endorsement certainly will help. 

With 218 Republicans in the House, they can only afford one Republican defection if they want to pass the bill. Even Republicans who have aired concerns about the impact on Medicaid and Medicare are expected to vote to pass the budget to move the process forward 

Don’t expect House Republicans to hold together for long.  Keeping Republicans on board with that plan will only get more challenging as the House and Senate try to iron out the differences in their budget approaches, and then craft the program changes the budget requires. 

House hearings this week 

  • 2/24:  House Rules Committee hearing on the House budget bill  
  • 2/26:  House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing on Pharmacy Benefit Manager Practices 

There You Have It 

What advice do you have for Zach and Debra?  ChatGPT advises learning to compromise, communicating openly, and supporting each other through conflict.  What’s yours?  Let us know! Make it a great week!  

Week Ahead: Washington’s Menu

For those who had Presidents’ Day off, we hope you enjoyed the holiday weekend. Even with the holiday, things continue to move quickly here in Washington. So, let’s get into it, Welcome to the Week Ahead!  

The Administration 

Something is cooking at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and given the swearing-in of RFK Jr. as Secretary, we assume the food is not processed. His first full week on the job coincides with the first full week for the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission.  The Secretary and his assistant chefs will have their hands full as the Executive Order creating the Commission calls for an assessment of how to address the childhood chronic disease crisis within 100 days.  

Even with all the excitement of a new cook in the kitchen, it’s important to remember that the President remains the top chef and hasn’t been waiting for his staff to arrive. In just 4 weeks, President Trump has issued over 60 Executive Orders since January 20, more than he signed in the first year of his first term! These orders are on top of dozens of other Administration actions that include limiting National Institutes of Health grant funding for “indirect costs” to cutting funding for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Navigator Program—and we can assume there will be more to come. So, what will he be cooking up this week?  We don’t expect Trump to take off his apron any time soon.  

The Senate  

Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is also eager to serve up his own special dish after the passage of a Senate budget resolution out of committee on February 12.  Look for the full Senate to debate the measure soon— possibly as early as this week.  

Regarding the ingredients list, several Senate Republicans have said they want to ensure a permanent extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts makes it into the final recipe. To make that easier, Republicans would have to use the Congressional Budget Office’s “current policy” baseline instead of using “current law” as the baseline. Using “current policy” means making the tax cuts permanent would cost significantly less dough. 

Why does that matter?  For health care, that means 2 big things.  One, Republicans may be less inclined to take a big chunk out of Medicaid spending to offset the cost of extending the tax cuts if the tax cuts cost less.  Two, other policies like the enhanced ACA premium tax credits, due to expire at the end of 2025, would also cost less.  What Republicans want to do with the ACA tax credits is far from being baked at this point.    

In non-budget news, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee will hold a hearing to consider the nomination of Lori Chavez-DeRemer to be the Secretary of Labor. In that role, she will be in a position to impact health care policy in several ways, including through the administration of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act which sets minimum standards for private, employer-based health plans.  While some of her positions have garnered praise from Democrats, we will see if her confirmation will be more like Secretary of Agriculture Rollins, who garnered 19 Democratic votes, or if she will face united Democratic opposition like HHS Secretary Kennedy.  

The House 

After the House Budget Committee came together to pass its own version of a budget resolution, the House of Representatives adjourned on February 13. This gives the cooks in the House a chance to take their menu on the road and hear from the diners directly while allowing critics to organize their messaging about why the menu should be rejected.  

Don’t forget that the expiration of the continuing resolution is less than a month away.  Appropriators are rumored to release topline numbers to come out for fiscal year 2025 any day now.  

There You Have It 

In honor of Presidents’ Day, we wanted to share some presidential trivia with you all, courtesy of the Library of Congress. How many did you get right? Let us know! Make it a great week!