Insights^

Find our analysis on legislation, regulations, MedPAC meetings, and more. 

Jen Holland: Leading with Purpose

Join us for an insightful conversation with Jen Holland, Chief of Staff at Chamber Hill Strategies, as she reflects on leadership philosophies and her unique journey to the dynamic world of politics and advocacy. 

What drew you to Chamber Hill Strategies?  

I was attracted to the firm by its founding partner Jennifer Bell, her vision, and the award-winning advocacy services that Chamber Hill Strategies provides for our clients. Jennifer embodies the qualities I value in a leader – integrity, passion and a deep commitment to excellence.  

The prospect of working for a woman-owned firm particularly appealed to me. As the firm expands into new service offerings, I am excited to play a central role in the firm’s continued growth and client success. 

What leadership styles do you value the most and how have they impacted you?  

Throughout my career, I’ve been fortunate to hold diverse positions that have provided me with an up-close perspective on senior leadership in various organizations. A valuable lesson I’ve gained is that the traits of a strong leader transcend industries. Excellence resides in the attention to detail and effective communication. Successful leaders articulate their vision with clarity and kindness. When combined, these qualities not only empower teams but also serve as powerful motivators. 

What’s some of the best career advice that you’ve received?  

Always recognize the significance of relationships. The most fulfilling aspects of my professional journey have revolved around connections—some developing into long-standing professional relationships, and some being brief and seemingly inconsequential, yet profoundly memorable. The world is teeming with fascinating individuals, and by taking the time to understand their stories, your life will be enriched. 

What do you like to do in your free time? 

I love kicking back with a good book in my free time—whether it’s a lazy weekend or a chill evening. It’s my go-to way to unwind and escape into different worlds, bringing a bit of joy and relaxation to my days. I especially like biographies which permit me to learn in detail about accomplished people. I also love to travel and recently traveled to Portugal, a lovely country with amazing food, centuries of history, and friendly people. (Canada Pharmacy)  

 

How does MedPAC work: A study in physician payments

A recent post came out saying, “How Out Of Touch is MedPAC? – They Are Recommending ONLY a 1.25% Payment Rate Increase for Physicians for 2024” – and it made us think, maybe some folks don’t know how MedPAC works?  We wanted to give a little inside baseball to explain the MedPAC Medicare payment update process.  

Congress created the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) to recommend Medicare payment updates and strategies to improve the Medicare program. MedPAC is mandated in their charter to submit recommendations on annual payment updates for several fee-for-service payment sectors within Medicare. As MedPAC examines each sector, they must look at that sector only within the context of Medicare; that is to say, they cannot look at nursing home payments from other payers (i.e., private plans, Medicaid, etc.). While MedPAC commissioners examine the financial strength of the overall industry, payment recommendations must also fit within the confines of current law. The Commission is also required to look at the sustainability of the Medicare program – so any payment recommendations must reflect the goal of keeping the Medicare program solvent over time.  

As an example of how this works – let’s look at physician payments.  Reviewing MedPAC’s December 2023 draft physician payment recommendation, MedPAC recommended that physician payments be updated by 50% of the projected increase in the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) in 2025. The MEI is projected to be approximately 2.6% in 2025, so MedPAC’s recommendation is for an update of 1.3% in 2025. Commissioners also recommended a non-budget neutral add-on payment tied to the number of low-income beneficiaries that providers see, as the Commission previously recommended in March 2023. The add-on payment would amount to 15% for primary care physicians and 5% for others.  

Many have commented that the recommended update does not keep up with inflation and that physicians will leave the program based on the lack of updates. So, why didn’t MedPAC recommend a higher update? Because the Commission must work within the confines of data measurements they use as indicators as mandated by Congress – beneficiary access, quality of care, Medicare payment rates, and provider costs. When looking at those indicators for next year’s payment rates, beneficiary access remains at the same levels as past years, quality of care is remaining steady (as much as it could be measured), and private plan payment rates were 136% of fee-for-service rates (which is consistent over time – private plans have been paying more for years).  The only indicator that looked negative within this framework was the Medicare Economic Index (which is a measure of clinicians input costs) – the MEI was projected to be 2.6% in 2025, higher than the pre-COVID rates of 1-2%. So, given those sets of data, MedPAC set as high a rate as they could given those confines. 

It is important to note that the Commission stated its concerns multiple times about the accuracy of the physician fee schedule, the underpricing of primary care services relative to other services, and the impact of these problems on the pipeline of future primary care physicians.  Commissioners in the December 2023 meeting expressed great concern about the small physician payment update, specifically about the flat fee schedule update and lack of an inflation adjustor.  In addition, over the past 10 years, MedPAC voted on numerous recommendations to change the physician payment system.  

Punchline:  Until Congress fixes the physician payment system, the physician payment hole will continue to get deeper.  

So, is MedPAC out of touch? No, not given the constraints under which they work.

How MedPAC works physician payment system

The Week Ahead 12/18/23: Bah Humbug! The Senate in One More Week – No Real Traction on Supplemental

Good morning from Washington DC, where like much of the east coast we were battered with rainstorms last night.  Fortunately, we woke to sunny skies coupled with forceful winds. The turbulence remined me of the push and pull taking place over the war supplemental request tied to border security measures, as conservatives are angling to slow roll the process and liberals are expressing concerns over actions in Gaza. We continue the conversation below as President Biden is being pulled in both directions, while also battling troubling poll numbers. As we conclude a turbulent political year which saw the ousting of a House Speaker, surprise retirements, and the expulsion of a perpetually lying congressman, we can only hope the administration and a divided congressional body learn to work together to fund the government and pass meaningful legislation in 2024. We can all learn something new – as I read an article last night clarifying the true cause behind the Boston Tea Party. It was caused over a corporate tax decrease (not an increase on tea tax) which would have enticed the colonists to buy lower-cost taxed tea thereby giving up the principle of no taxation without representation. The Senate is in this week and President Biden dodged a car crashing into his motorcade!  Welcome to the Week Ahead!

The Administration

What a past few days President Biden experienced.  Last night, a car crashed into a SUV in his motorcade right after he answered questions from reporters about why he is trailing Trump in the polls.  Fortunately, the President and First Lady were fine.  In addition to polling headaches, the President continues to face an uphill battle in terms of his war supplemental request. As we’ve mentioned in past weeks, the administration wants to provide funding to Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan, but the House wants to link any funding request to changes in border security measures. The President, feeling much like the Stealers Wheel Song – Stuck in the Middle With You, is feeling clowns to the left of him and jokers to the right. Conservative opposition to funding Ukraine without reforming border security measures continues to mount and stall the process, while members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus voiced concerns about the Biden Administration not communicating with them regarding negotiations which took place this weekend.

In healthcare news, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services released a voluntary payment model to improve maternal health in the US, a pillar of the Biden Administration’s goals in healthcare. The Transforming Maternal Health Model (TMaH) plans to partner with state Medicaid agencies to lower maternal mortality rates while reducing associated health disparities. The initiative will develop a value-based alterative payment model which will improve health outcomes and quality.  TMaH will focus on three main pillars: 1. Access to care, infrastructure, workforce capacity; 2. Quality and safety, 3. Whole-person delivery.  The program aims to work with participating states to address gaps in maternal health care by supporting access to midwives and doulas, improving perinatal care for chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension, and reducing c-sections for low-risk mothers.

 

The Senate

Senate Majority Leader Schumer made sure he received less holiday cards this season as he called the Senate in session this week.  Senator Schumer hoped this week would allow for a negotiated package to come to the floor this week.  However, negotiators on the supplemental request, while making progress, failed to come to agreement on a package.  The White House was directly involved, and it is reported that some provisions were agreed to but that large hurdles remain.  Senate Republicans are in no rush to have a vote, and Senator Chris Murphy stated no legislative text exists for members to vote on at this time.  Senator Ron Johnson led a group letter of conservatives requesting a conference-wide meeting to discuss what they felt were “secret” negotiations with Democrats. All this to say, it is unlikely a floor vote on a supplemental request without legislative text will pass this week.  This sets up a particularly busy early part of January which also runs into the first tranche of government funding.  The Senate is also moving on stalled military nominations this week.

Senators are moving in a bipartisan work on health transparency with new legislation that requires insurers, hospitals, and other health facilities to disclose more pricing information.  The legislation entitled, The Health Care Price Transparency Act, 2.0, aims to be more stringent than its House counterpart by requiring hospitals to post the actual price for a service, rather than the median price. Like the House passed Lower Costs More Transparency Act, the measure extends transparency requirements to imaging centers and clinical labs, among others.

The House

The House finished its business last week and is out until next year.

Things will pick up quickly come January 8 as the House will only have eight legislative days before the first set of appropriations and health extender deadlines hit on January 19.  The House will only have an additional 4 legislative days before the second set of appropriations deadlines hits on February 2.  Rumors have started to percolate the House could extend the appropriations bills set to expire on January 19 to February 2, and a very likely scenario is a year-long continuing resolution to fund the government at current levels through Fiscal Year 2024 will be the result in February.

With multiple health extender deadlines hitting on either January 19 or 20, whatever government funding package is passed to fund the government past January 19 is expected to include health extenders. With the House having passed the Support for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act last week with broad bipartisan support, it is rumored that the legislation could be packaged and passed along with provisions to provide partial relief from a scheduled 3.37% cut in Medicare physician payments and extend incentive payments for alternative payment models that would closely align with provisions passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee and by the Senate Finance Committee. Other provisions to be included would extend payments under the Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospitals (DSH) Program, an extension of the Work Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) Floor, and extensions of funding for Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THC GME), Community Health Centers (CHCs), and the National Health Service Corps (NHSC).

While the House did also pass the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act with bipartisan support last week, it seems less likely that the pharmacy benefit manager reforms and other measures, including site neutral payments for certain services, will be in play for moving in a January package because why include things to which everyone agrees?

As always, we value your insights and look forward to hearing from you!  This will most likely be the last Week Ahead for 2023.  Thank you for making this a wonderful year, and from all of us at Chamber Hill Strategies we wish you happy holidays and a fantastic New Year!

Create a great week!

What Happened, What You Missed: December 11-15, 2023

HHS Finalizes Rule on Interoperability, AI Transparency 

A newly finalized rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) marks the federal government’s first attempt to regulate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care.  Specifically, the rule establishes transparency requirements for AI and predictive algorithms that are used to support clinical decision support (CDS) and decision support interventions (DSIs).  HHS says the rule will support the widespread use of AI in health care, which proponents say could help reduce administrative and clinical burden.  The rule will also support interoperability by requiring developers of certified health IT to report certain metrics, which will better inform how health IT is used in health care delivery. 

GAO Reports on No Surprises Act’s Rocky Implementation 

The federal government is seeing far more disputes between commercial insurers and health care providers over out-of-network bills than anticipated, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).  Enacted in 2021, the No Surprises Act established a baseball-style independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for insures and providers to settle payment disagreements to protect patients from receiving unexpected balance bills.  As of June 2023, the federal government has received nearly 490,000 payment disputes – a far cry from the initially projected figure of 22,000.  Nearly 61% of these disputes remain unresolved, which the GAO attributes to the difficulty of determining which disputes are eligible for the federal IDR process.  The federal government has proposed that insurers and providers submit more information up front to help address the high volume of disputes.   

FDA to Consider Psychedelic Drugs for PTSD Treatment 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will consider approval of the psychedelic drug MDMA in conjunction with other intervention to help treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies Public Benefit Corporation (MAPS PBC), which recently filed a new drug application (NDA) with the agency.  If the new treatment is approved, the Drug Enforcement Administration would be required to reschedule MDMA to make it available for prescription use.  Also known as ecstasy, MDMA has been studied since the 1970s to help patients process certain experiences and emotions.  The company’s NDA focuses on two lates-stage clinical trial studies showing patients receiving three doses of MDMA saw a higher reduction of PTSD symptoms than those receiving a placebo. 

CMS: Health Spending Returns to Pre-Pandemic Levels 

Health care spending in the US increased 4.1% in 2022 to $4.5 trillion, or $13,493 per person, according to new data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).  This growth rate is within range of a 4.4% average growth in spending between 2016 and 2019, signifying a return to pre-pandemic health care trends.  Health care spending growth spiked to 10.6% in 2020 before declining to 3.2% the following year.  The data also found a record high of 92% of Americans were insured last year, although this record may not last due to declining Medicaid enrollment as states continue their Medicaid redetermination process.  As far as goods and services go, prescription drug spending increased the most in 2022 at 8. (ndu.edu.ng) 4%, while spending on physician and clinical services jumped 2.7%.   

ICYMI: Ex-Speaker McCarthy Bids Adieu to Congress 

Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) gave his final floor speech on Thursday.  The floor speech was delivered in what’s likely to be McCarthy’s last legislative day in Congress, as the California Republican is expected to officially resign by the end of 2023.  McCarthy notably expressed no regrets about his decision to advance a clean continuing resolution on the House floor in September, which ultimately lead to his ouster from the speakership.  While McCarthy delivered his remarks before a largely empty House chamber, two close allies – Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and French Hill (R-AR) – were in attendance to offer their well wishes. 

How to Lobby Congress: Insights from a Leading DC Lobbying Firm 

Navigating the halls of Congress to influence policy decisions is both an art and a science. As an established lobbying firm in DC, Chamber Hill Strategies has honed the craft of effective lobbying. In this guide, we delve deeper into how to lobby Congress, drawing from our extensive experience as DC lobbyists. Whether you’re a seasoned advocate or new to the realm of political influence, these expanded strategies will empower you to make a meaningful impact.

Understanding the Legislative Process

Research and Preparation: A critical step in effective lobbying is understanding the legislative process. Resources such as Congress.gov provide a wealth of information about current bills, committee activities, and legislative procedures, essential for anyone engaging in lobbying in DC.

Building Relationships

  1. Community Engagement: Engaging in local politics, such as attending town halls and joining community groups, can be a valuable way to start. These settings offer opportunities to voice concerns and connect with local representatives, a common practice among lobbyists in Washington DC.
  2. Social Media Engagement: Platforms like Twitter and Facebook serve as modern tools for engaging with legislators. They allow for direct communication and offer a platform to participate in political discourse.

Crafting Your Message

Clear and Concise Messaging: Conveying your message clearly is essential. Incorporating personal stories and supplementing them with data can make your message more compelling. The Pew Research Center is a resource for finding relevant data to support your arguments.

Data and Evidence: Utilizing data to reinforce your message is a strategy commonly used by lobbyists. Accessible public data sources like Data.gov are invaluable for this purpose.

Effective Advocacy Strategies

Direct Lobbying: Direct communication with legislators can be highly effective. For those looking to engage in this manner, USA.gov provides guidelines on contacting elected officials.

Grassroots Mobilization:

  1. Community Meetings and Forums: Participating in or organizing local events can be an effective way to spread awareness and encourage collective advocacy efforts.
  2. Online Campaigns: Platforms like Change.org are increasingly used for mobilizing public support around various causes.

Engage with Our Experts at Chamber Hill Strategies

As an award-winning lobbying firm in DC, Chamber Hill Strategies is dedicated to providing expert assistance and strategic guidance in lobbying Congress. Whether you’re an individual advocate or represent an organization, we offer personalized support to help you navigate the complex landscape of Washington DC lobbying. For more information, please visit our Contact Us page.

How to Lobby Congress: Insights from a Leading DC Lobbying Firm

Subscribe to Us Now!

Be a DC insider by getting our updates straight to your inbox