Insights^

Find our analysis on legislation, regulations, MedPAC meetings, and more. 

The PHE Was Just Extended. What Does That Mean?

So, what exactly happens to those regulatory flexibilities and emergency measures when the pandemic ends?  On April 15, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) extended the PHE for a 90-day period beginning on April 21 and ending on July 19.  HHS won’t keep doing this forever – so what happens when the PHE is no longer renewed?

The PHE So Far

HHS first declared the COVID-19 PHE on January 27, 2020, and HHS has since renewed the PHE four times, each for 90 days.  When Acting Health and Human Services Secretary Norris Cochran  sent a letter to state governors on January 21, 2021 estimating  the PHE will likely remain in place for the entirety of 2021,” many thought the current extension would run through the calendar year, but Secretary Xavier Becerra extended the PHE through July 19, following the pattern of 90-day renewals as stipulated by the Public Health Service Act.  The January 2021 letter indicated that when HHS decides to terminate the declaration and/or let the PHE expire, the Department will provide states with 60 days’ notice.

When Will the PHE End?

Do you remember when President George W. Bush relayed the message that the war in Iraq was over during his famed aircraft carrier speech on May 1, 2003, and then the war continued for many years?  Is that what will happen with the PHE?

As it goes, there isn’t a requirement that  HHS outline any specific criteria to be met for the PHE to end.  The Health and Human Services Secretary has the option of declaring the PHE over, or he may simply not extend the current emergency.  For their part,  the American Health Care Association offered one suggestion – that the  PHE be lifted if roughly 70% of the population has been vaccinated, or less than 500 COVID-19 deaths have occurred for 14 consecutive days .

Key Measures Linked to the PHE

Both Congress and the Administration have advanced key COVID-19 relief measures whose expiration dates are linked to the termination of the PHE.  Below is a list of pivotal relief measures and their central provisions.

  • Certain measures included in COVID-19 relief legislation.  Many policies tied to the PHE are included in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, enacted March 18, 2020, the CARES Act, enacted March 27, 2020, and the American Rescue Plan Act, enacted March 11, 2021.  Some of these measures expire at the conclusion of the PHE, while others have a specific end date beyond the PHE, such as the one year or one calendar quarter after the termination of the PHE.  Key provisions include:
    • Enhanced coverage and no cost-sharing for COVID-19 testing and vaccines under Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE.
    • Waived or modified Medicare requirements for telehealth, such as the restriction on use of a telephone and the requirement for face-to-face visits between home dialysis patients and physicians.
    • Increased Medicaid federal match rate to 6.2%.
    • Waived site-neutral payment rate provisions for long-term care hospitals.
    • Continued payments to providers via the Medicare Hospital Accelerated Payment Program.
    • Recalculated Medicaid disproportionate share hospital allotment.
  • Temporary regulatory flexibilities under CMS.  In interim final rules published on March 31May 8September 2, and November 2, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has relaxed numerous Medicare and Medicaid rules for the duration of the PHE.  Examples include testing and reporting requirements for long-term care facilities, enhanced Medicare reimbursement for certain COVID-19 treatments, and price transparency requirements for COVID-19 tests.  The interim final rules also include a number of telehealth provisions, with notable examples including:
    • Waived requirements on the types of practitioners that can furnish Medicare telehealth services to include all practitioners eligible for Medicare reimbursement, including physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech language pathologists.
    • Modified reporting requirements for remote physiological monitoring services.
    • Payment parity for audio-only telephone services.
    • Allowing hospitals to bill for services provided remotely by hospital-based practitioners to Medicare beneficiaries registered as outpatients.
    • Allowing teaching physicians to review services provided by resident physicians remotely via audio-visual communications technology.
  • Section 1135 Waivers.  Since the start of the pandemic, CMS has invoked Section 1135 waiver authority to issue a blanket waiver and a series of state-specific waivers that expand telehealth coverage, allow clinicians to practice across state lines, and suspend some reporting requirements.  All of these waivers are set to expire at the conclusion of the PHE.
  • HIPAA Enforcement.  The HHS Office of Civil Rights has relaxed certain HIPAA privacy rules for the duration of the PHE that apply to telehealth technologies, testing sites, and web-based scheduling platforms for COVID-19 vaccination appointments.
  • Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute.  The HHS Office of the Inspector General has issued guidance discouraging enforcement of pandemic response activities until the end of the PHE that could be viewed as problematic under the anti-kickback statute and the Stark Laws.
  • Controlled Substances. Both the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration have issued guidance allowing more flexibility for providers and opioid treatment programs to prescribe controlled substances during the PHE.

Previewing a Post-PHE World

As vaccinations increase and jurisdictions gradually reopen, the fate of temporary policies that expire at the end of the PHE remains unclear.  Fortunately, recent actions by federal officials offer clues as to how some of temporary policies may be retained, particularly those relating to telehealth.  As expressed by then-CMS Administrator Seema Verma in December 2020, congressional action will be essential to ensuring expanded telehealth coverage and other flexibilities can be made permanent.  Since then, policymakers have been providing suggestions to lawmakers on what to do with telehealth after the PHE ends.  In its March 15, 2021 report to Congress, for example, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission recommended continuing some telehealth flexibilities one to two years following the end of the PHE to evaluate whether the temporary policies should be adopted permanently.  The report also provided the following recommendations to Congress:

  • Continue Medicare coverage for telehealth services, regardless of a beneficiary’s location.
  • Discontinue allowing providers to reduce or waive cost-sharing for telehealth.
  • Continue coverage of audio-only services if there is a clinical benefit.

Additionally, members of Congress have put forth their own proposals to permanently expand telehealth.  Key legislation introduced so far includes:

  • H.R. 366, the “Protecting Access to Post-COVID–19 Telehealth Act of 2021,” introduced by Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA), which would eliminate most geographic and originating site restrictions on the use of telehealth in Medicare and authorize CMS to continue reimbursement for telehealth for 90 days beyond the end of the PHE.
  • H.R. 787, the “Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act,” introduced by Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA), which would permanently expand telehealth services for students.
  • H.R. 937, the “Tech to Save Moms Act,” introduced by Rep. Eddie Bernie Johnson (D-TX), which would integrate telehealth models into maternity care services.

While the federal government may not yet have a specific plan on how it intends to handle temporary regulatory flexibilities once the pandemic expires, recent action from legislators and policymakers suggest a desire to keep at least some policies around permanently.

pexels-aphiwat-chuangchoem-359989-scaled-1-1920x1280

The Week in Review: May 3-7

Biden Announces Goal to Partially Vaccinate 70% by July 4

On May 4, President Biden announced a new goal to have 70% or more Americans with at least one shot of a COVID-19 vaccine and 160 million Americans fully vaccinated by July 4.  The President also announced a new vaccination strategy that will try to reallocate vaccine supply from states with weaker demand to areas with a stronger interest in shots.  At the moment, 57% percent of Americans have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, while nearly 105 million are fully vaccinated.  While public health experts believe the Administration’s goal is attainable, pockets of vaccine hesitancy in the country present an obstacle.

Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines Poised for Full FDA Approval

On May 7, Pfizer filed for full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for its COVID-19 vaccine for people ages 16 to 85.  Earlier in the week, Moderna announced in its First Quarter 2021 earnings report plans to seek full FDA approval by the end of May for its COVID-19 vaccine for people ages 18 to 65.  Full approval would provide employers and organizations greater legal authority to require employees and students to get vaccinated.

Federal Government Likely to Approve COVID Vaccine for Adolescents Next Week

On May 6, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) announced it will hold meeting on May 12 vote on whether to extend the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s COVID-19 for adolescents ages 12-15.  While ACIP’s decision is non-binding, the FDA is all but certain to follow through with the committee’s recommendation.  Many states have already begun allowing adolescents to register early for the vaccine, and President Biden has pledged that 20,000 pharmacy sites across the nation will be ready to vaccinate adolescents as soon as the FDA formally extends the EUA.  Pfizer is planning to seek an emergency use authorization for children ages 2 to 11 in September.

Stefanik Soon to Succeed Cheney as House GOP Chair

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) is all but certain to succeed Rep. Lynne Cheney (R-WY) as Chair of the House Republican Conference after Cheney’s criticism of former President Trump and his role in the January 6th riot drew strong rebukes from prominent Republicans.  House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) was recently caught on a hot mic saying he had “lost confidence” in Cheney, while House Republican Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) and former President Trump have publicly backed Stefanik.  The New York Congresswoman, who served in the Bush White House and has been long considered a moderate in the GOP, rose to national prominence in her defense of the former President during his 2020 impeachment trial.  Many interpret Cheney’s ouster as a sign of Trump’s continued influence on the Republican Party.

ICYMI: Breyer Faces Calls to Retire

Some progressive groups and several members of Congress including Reps. Mondaire Jones (D-NY) and Jared Huffman (D-CA) are calling on 82-year-old US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer to resign.  Their concerns over Breyer are likely rooted in the political fallout from the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was replaced by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.  Some Democrats feel Breyer should retire while Democrats have control of the White House and Senate, meaning he could be replaced with another liberal-leaning justice.  However, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a member of the Judiciary Committee, has said it would be a “great loss” if Breyer opted to retire.

pexels-gustavo-fring-3985170-scaled-1-1920x1280

How to Rock the Virtual Hill Meeting

With things opening up soon, staff and members of Congress whom we talk to anticipate virtual meetings will continue.  This is because virtual meetings allow more efficient use of time for the members and staff, as well as the potential for greater participation from constituents and advocates who can’t travel to DC.  While not great for relationship building, virtual advocacy can be productive and definitely worth the time and effort.

Here are some tips —-

  • Platform choice goes to the member of Congress or staff.  Unlike most other professional settings, Hill still prefers telephone so don’t be surprised.  While more and more offices on Capitol Hill have adopted videoconferencing as their go-to platform for meetings, some individual staffers prefer phone calls.  Whatever the case, let the congressional staffer decide the best way to conduct a virtual meeting.
  • Send materials ahead of time.  3-4 page powerpoints are great.  You can email other advocacy papers too as attachments, but don’t except the people you’re meeting with to read it all ahead of time.
  • Use visual aids.  Don’t simply email a congressional staffer the handouts you’d otherwise share during an in-person meeting.  If you’re using a videoconferencing platform to conduct a meeting, there are more opportunities to convey your message, whether it be through images, a PowerPoint presentation, or videos.
  • Location, location, location.   With a virtual meeting, you have the chance to bring a legislator or a staffer into your world.  Consider broadcasting your virtual meeting from a safe location that helps to tell your story or convey your message.  For example, if you’re a health care provider, consider participating in a virtual meeting from your workplace, whether it be a hospital or another medical setting.
  • Plan ahead and select a “meeting captain.”  Plan ahead what to say – it will make the virtual visit go smoother.  Create a few simple talking points, 3-4 messages you can make sure get across in your conversation.  If your virtual meeting contains multiple advocates, give each individual specific messages or issues to discuss so that everyone’s voice is heard.  If your meeting contains more than three advocates, consider designating someone as a “meeting captain” to introduce all participants and steer the overall conversation.
  • Check your tech!  Familiarize yourself with Zoom and whichever other platforms you may be using to ensure that your message isn’t held back by any technical difficulties.  Make sure all links work appropriately and your devices handle whichever virtual meeting platforms you may be using.   If you supplied the dial-in number, check to see if you sent the correct passcode.

Even when the pandemic subsides, virtual meetings are likely to continue to play a role in advocacy.  Advocates who would otherwise be unable to travel to a legislator’s office due to geography or scheduling conflicts can make a difference by connecting virtually.  In time, virtual meetings may complement in-person meetings and serve to strengthen an overall advocacy message.

pexels-karolina-grabowska-4491461-scaled-1-1920x1280

The “Dark Money” Pushing for Price Transparency

If you were one of the nearly 10 million people who tuned in to watch the 93rd Academy Awards on April 25, one television ad may have jumped out.  An organization called Power for Patients aired a 30-second spot featuring actresses Susan Sarandon and Cynthia Ervio that urged hospitals to follow through on a “law” requiring them to disclose their prices.  The law in question undoubtedly stems from a final rule issued in November 2019 that obligates hospitals, beginning January 1, 2021, to post comprehensive lists of various charges for all items and services.   This raises two questions: who is behind the ad, and why?

Dark Money and Health Care Advocacy

As of this writing, Power for Patients has yet to disclose which organizations covered the cost of its $2 million ad.  This suggests Power for Patients is a “dark money” entity, meaning the group receives funding from undisclosed donors to influence public opinion.

Dark money isn’t new to health care advocacy.  In 2019, a group known as Doctor Patient Unity spent $28.6 million on ads aimed at thwarting legislation on surprise medical bills.  The ads, which aired during August recess, were targeted at legislation that would resolve out-of-network medical bills through benchmark rates set by the federal government.  Eventually, Doctor Patient Unity confirmed reports from the New York Times that physician staffing firms Envision Healthcare and TeamHealth were among the groups sponsoring the ads.

Who’s Funding Power for Patients?

No one really knows yet who is funding Power for Patients, but recent activity in in DC may provide a clue.   On March 23, Marni Jameson Carey, Executive Director of the Association of Independent Doctors (AID), testified before a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing on legislation to expand health care coverage.  During the hearing, Carey said the price transparency rule has not been enforced as it stands, and that hospitals need to be held accountable.  Carey also spoke out against facility fees, which are often charged at clinics that are owned by hospitals to cover the costs of maintaining the facility.  It is also worth noting that Carey retweeted the Power for Patients ad on April 25.

Based in Florida, AID lists the elimination of facility fees and increased price transparency as its chief policy goals, both of which were discussed in Carey’s appearance before the Health Subcommittee.  Facility fees are required to be disclosed under the price transparency rule, and perhaps AID and independent physicians hope greater enforcement of the rule could shine a light on facility fees, raising questions from patients and potentially drumming up support for the total elimination of the fees.  AID’s website also lists several sponsors whose businesses center on providing services to independent physicians.  These sponsors include AdvancedMD, a billing solutions platform for independent practices, ISMIE Mutual Insurance Company, a medical liability insurer, and SVN Senior Commercial Real Estate, which specializes in medical real estate for independent physicians. (magiklights.com)   Given Carey’s testimony and IAD’s policy goals, it’s certainly plausible independent doctors and organizations with mutual interests could be donors to Power to Patients.

Lax Enforcement?

Beyond ending facility fees, Carey’s testimony on March 23 also included pleas to step up enforcement of the hospital price transparency rule, which carries a $300 a day penalty for noncompliance.  Indeed, multiple reports have found compliance among hospitals to be mixed.  A report conducted by consulting firm ADVI Health in January 2021 found less than half of 20 of the nation’s largest health systems were fully compliant with the price transparency law.  Additionally, a study from Health Affairs published in March 2021 found 65 of the nation’s 100 largest hospitals to be largely noncompliant.

In cases where hospitals are compliant with the rule, pricing information can be difficult for consumers to find.  An analysis from consulting firm Milliman released in April 2021 found that while 37 of 55 major health systems were in compliance with the law, the pricing data itself were presented in a variety of ways, often without any supplemental documentation or in “very complex hierarchical structures.”  Similarly, the Wall Street Journal reported in March 2021 that some hospitals were using special coding on their website to keep pricing data hidden from search result.

Lawmakers and regulators are paying attention.  On April 13, bipartisan leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra urging HHS to conduct “vigorous oversight” and enforce “full compliance” of the final rule.  Additionally, a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services spokesperson told Fierce Healthcare in March 2021 that the agency plans to enforce the rule.  However, in the absence of more widespread compliance, Power for Patients and its supporters may be using the ad campaign to generate public awareness that could pressure the federal government to step up enforcement.

More Dark Money Ahead?

That said, the purpose of the price transparency rule was to make the health care system more consumer-friendly and give patients the option to compare prices.  However, by pushing for greater compliance and enforcement, stakeholders such as independent doctors may be using the rule to push patients toward non-hospital-based physician practices.   Isn’t it a little ironic that a group who is pushing for transparency not be transparent about their own organizational structure and donor base?

pexels-rodnae-productions-6129121-scaled-1-1920x1280

The Week in Review: April 26-30

Biden Makes Sweeping Health Care Proclamations in Address to Congress

President Biden declared “health care should be a right, not a privilege” in his April 28 address to Congress, where he formally unveiled the American Families Plan.  This proposal would make $2 trillion in investments to education, childcare, and paid leave, as well as make permanent the American Rescue Plan’s two-year increase in Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credits.  During the address, the President also voiced a commitment to allow Medicare to directly negotiate with drug manufacturers on prices, which is not included in the American Families Plan.  Biden said the savings accrued by empowering Medicare to negotiate on drug prices could be used to strengthen the ACA and expand Medicare coverage, hinting at previous calls to lower the Medicare eligibility age to 60 and create a public option.

CDC Loosens Guidance on Wearing Masks Outdoors

On April 27, the CDC updated its guidance to say vaccinated Americans do not need to wear masks when outdoors, except when in large crowds.  Masks are still recommended for vaccinated people in indoor public spaces, however.  The updated guidance comes after the US reached a milestone of 50% of adults at least partially vaccinated on April 18 as well as calls from public health experts to remove outdoor mask mandates.  On April 28, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci said “more liberal guidelines” could be down the pike as vaccinations continue and infection levels drop.

CMS Proposes FY22 IPPS, Boost Residency Slots

CMS proposed a 2.8% rate increase in the agency’s Fiscal Year 2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rule on April 27.  The proposal would also add 1,000 physician residency slots in accordance with last year’s Consolidated Appropriations Act.  To advance health equity, the proposal seeks comment on ways CMS can improve reporting of health disparities and develop a health equity score measure.  Hospital stakeholders including the American Hospital Association reacted positively to a provision that would strike a requirement for hospitals to report their median payer-specific charges negotiated with Medicare Advantage plans.

GOP Lawmakers Come Together for Vaccine Ad

A group of Republican members of Congress who are also health care practitioners released a video on April 27 urging the public to get vaccinated against COVID-19.   Among the 10 Republicans featured in the video are Sen. John Barrasso (WY), a physician, Rep. Buddy Carter (GA), a pharmacist, and Rep. Brian Babin (TX), a dentist.  In the video, the lawmakers emphasized the vaccines’ safety and effectiveness, and they framed vaccinations as a step towards returning to normal life.  The video’s release follows numerous reports of high levels vaccine hesitancy among Republican men, which some public health officials fear could be a major obstacle to achieving herd immunity.

New Census Data Give GOP Upper Hand in Redrawing Districts

The latest data from the US Census Bureau shows a continuation in migration patterns towards the South and the West.  States in the Northeast and Midwest including New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Illinois, will each lost one House seat, while Oregon, Colorado, Montana, North Carolina, and Florida will each gain one seat.  The census data comes as many states across the country prepare to draw new congressional districts.  Many of the states that have gained a House seat are under Republican control, meaning the GOP will determine the redrawing of a plurality of new congressional districts.

ICYMI: DC Has a New Underground Tunnel

It’s not just the US Capitol Complex and Metrorail system that have underground tunnels in the Washington, DC.  DC Water just completed work on a 5-mile long, 23-foot-wide tunnel under the city that will help prevent sewage overflows in the Anacostia River and stop flooding that has plagued neighborhoods like Bloomingdale and Le Droit Park in recent years.  The tunnel was constructed by an over 360-foot boring machine called “Chris.”  DC Water hopes the tunnel will help make the Anacostia River open to swimming and fishing in the future. (michaelpalance.com)

pexels-pierre-blache-3369102-scaled-1-1920x1080

Subscribe to Us Now!

Be a DC insider by getting our updates straight to your inbox